http://www.codeplex.com/NBehave/Release/ProjectReleases.aspxNBehave Reviews Rss Descriptionhttp://nbehave.codeplex.com/releases/view/36413#ReviewBy-bronumskiRated 2 Stars (out of 5) - Like kadukf said. Use StoryQ but keep hold of the NBehave.Spec assembly for the "Should" extension methods as they read very nicely.bronumskiTue, 21 Sep 2010 12:36:52 GMTReviewed: NBehave 0.4.5 (Sep 21, 2010) 20100921123652Phttp://nbehave.codeplex.com/releases/view/36413#ReviewBy-kadukfRated 1 Stars (out of 5) - Guys, take a look at StoryQ - we usd NBehave from v 0..3 but after v0.4.5 we migrated to SotryQ ....

http://fknet.wordpress.com/2010/03/25/nbehave-out-storyq-in/kadukfThu, 25 Mar 2010 10:45:08 GMTReviewed: NBehave 0.4.5 (Mar 25, 2010) 20100325104508Ahttp://nbehave.codeplex.com/Release/ProjectReleases.aspx?ReleaseId=36413#ReviewBy-palazkovRated 4 Stars (out of 5) - Has no possibility to run tests under VS IDE -- that's a big drawback because it's often useful to debug tests.

I even wrote a simply wrapper which allows me to run plain text scenario within IDE (using just runner with some custom listeners to supply with setup/teardown functionality) it would be nice to have it provided out-of-the-box.

Anyway, it's the only tool which allows me to do my BDDpalazkovThu, 10 Dec 2009 07:35:20 GMTReviewed: NBehave 0.4.5 (Dec 09, 2009) 20091210073520Ahttp://nbehave.codeplex.com/Release/ProjectReleases.aspx?ReleaseId=36413#ReviewBy-palazkovRated 4 Stars (out of 5) - Has no possibility to run tests under VS IDE -- that's a big drawback because it's often useful to debug tests.

Despite I wrote a quick wrapper which allows me to run plain text scenario within IDE (using just runner with some custom listeners to supply with setup/teardown functionality) it would be nice to have it provided out-of-the-box.

Anyway, it's the only tool which allows me to do my BDDpalazkovThu, 10 Dec 2009 07:34:48 GMTReviewed: NBehave 0.4.5 (Dec 09, 2009) 20091210073448A